UAF lies

Nowadays I don’t usually publicise or link to UAF lies and hysteria as it gives them unwarranted attention.

However, I will make just one exception to serve as an example of the lies.

This article….

****://lancasteruaf.blogspot.com/2008/05/lee-barnes-lays-down-law-to-challengers.html

(replace the stars with “http”, I don’t want to generate links for the Fascists)

……discusses a fake email. Now look at the comments on the article. Note they are nearly all anonymous, full of lies, slander, hatred and nonsense and basically saying the same thing one hundred times over. And yet, Ketlan never publishes a comment from yours truly when it is civil and simply critical.

So, I will publish it here instead. This is the comment I sent Ketlan today:

What I find hilarious is that you refuse to accept comments that criticise you, Ketlan, or your articles and yet you happily publish anonymous comments full of brazen, blatant lies and hysteria such as your “Griffins a tosser” comment. It shows quite clearly that you have zero respect for free speech and only care for hatred and hysteria. And you have the nerve to call yourself an anti-Fascist.

Your side link articles are just as pathetic. “Why the BNP are Fascist” contains no definition of Fascism - scholarly or otherwise - despite the fact it is notoriously hard to define. It is simply a collection of isolated incidents presented as some kind of proof of a doctrine the writer clearly is ignorant of and, in reality, wishes to use a label to intimidate a party he hates.

You know and I know you won’t publish this comment (though I will) or you’ll publish it with a hysterical rebuttal and then refuse me a reply. It doesn’t matter. You know I’m right.

Another inconvenient truth

**I am NOT suggesting for a second that a person’s genetic stock makes them more or less likely to commit a crime. I also don’t deny that social status plays a big role. **

Nick Griffin was shot down in flames for it on ‘Newsnight’, Simon Darby was burned at the verbal stake on some radio phone in show and I will probably now be called all manner of obscenities by the PC brigade. However, none of this changes the fact that in my opinion (and statistical fact) the percentage of non-Caucasian drug dealers in the UK is disproportionate to their numbers.

This can be proven factually. Which document am I using? It’s got to be some BNP front organisation with dodgy statistics right?

No, sorry, it’s a Home Office document. Given the severe pressure on the government to be politically correct, this implies that the statistics could be even more worrying than those disclosed.

http://www.justice.gov.uk/docs/race-and-cjs-stats-2006.pdf

England is approximately three percent black and four percent Asian (not including Chinese). Yet, as the report shows, in every county the number of black and Asian people arrested for drug offences was over represented and often more than twice what should be expected by average.

Also laid to rest is Nadia’s claim that “racial assaults fell” in 2007. She used this to discredit the drop in racial assaults in B+D following the BNP councillor’s election there.

http://www.procuratorfiscal.gov.uk/About/Departmental-Overview/diversity/racist-crime/Statistics0506

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/27/race.ukcrime

So given the fact that racist crime fell in the area with most BNP councillors while it increased elsewhere, is this not to the BNP’s credit? Or at least does it not put a very firm dent in the idea that the BNP bring racial assaults with them?

Griffin’s claim that Muslims are responsible for importing drugs is harder to verify. To my knowledge there are no records kept of an offender’s religion. There is however a large set of circumstantial evidence as disclosed by the BNP.

http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/03/nick-griffin-and-the-bnp-tell-the-truth/

Let me repeat I am NOT suggesting for a second that a person’s genetic stock makes them more or less likely to commit a crime. I also don’t deny that social status plays a big role.

I am merely pointing out an unpleasant side effect of multiculturalism that we seem scared to talk about. Why are the minority communities not doing more to address this problem?

A minor result

So finally, I get my first (almost) direct on line shout out from the UAF. The UAF sites (with the exception of Barnsley UAF) are a bunch of cowardly, hate filled, hysterical yet usually anonymous bloggers who have no life of their own and therefore spend all their time blogging not about politics or the party they support, but an undemocratic hate group known as UAF.

Anyway Lee John Barnes of the BNP has his own stalker blogger who is actually sad enough to shout me in the profile section: (I also declare this quote of the week):

“Also, we’d like to hear from any BNP members living in Thailand with mixed race children in contravention of the BNP’s opposition to mixed-race relationships and the resultant offspring. So, do drop us an email on how you resolve such a dilemma and yet retain membership of the BNP. Many thanks.“

Great! Well, LJB’s obsessive stalker, your question is a valid one but is also none of your business. However, I do have something I wish to say to you, Ketlan (who I actually thought was female) and all the other Fascists. It is something I could never say better than Kyle Bristow did to another leftie so allow me to quote precocious young Kyle:

I read your email about how you are disappointed with my alleged hatred and racism. I cannot adequately write to express how thrilled I am to hear this. It always is great to be told that I irk the left-wing scum of my country who yearn to destroy Western civilization.

If there is anything else I can do to cause pain and suffering for liberals, please let me know. My goal in life is to piss off liberals so much that steam starts coming out of their ears, their heads rotate a full 360 degrees around, they vomit pea soup, and their heads explode.

Cordially,

I trust Kyle doesn’t mind my copying, since he knows it’s in a good cause.

See you when I get elected, LJB stalker.

More lies

They say if you tell a lie long enough, people accept it as gospel. Well that certainly seems to be the case with some circles. The ‘Holocaust Denial’ debate rages on. Why? Simple, some people have use for lies.

The BNP have never denied the Holocaust, I have never denied the Holocaust and Nick Griffin has said:

“I have never denied the fact that the Nazis murdered huge numbers of Jews in one of the great crimes of a century of terrible inhumanity.”

The controversy is all based on a tiny clip circulating on the net. Griffin was once on camera over ten years ago saying “There’s no doubt people died and that’s tragic” he then went on to (foolishly) question the methods. He has since retracted those statements many times over.

Yet still, some kind, Fascist hating liberals continue to press this charge, convinced that guilt is guilt because they want it to be guilt. No doubt they would have been great judges in seventeenth century Salem.

The SPL recently made raised this ‘denial’ claim yet again on their blog, and I stepped in to point out the truth. After my comment was removed on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s blog (an overrated site if ever there was one) blogger Tremlett announced on the same page that he had “shred” my argument and “exposed” me as BNP. Because, of course, membership of a legal political party needs to be “exposed”! Why he choose to do that there when he had already commented on my blog is known only to him.

Mr Tremlett’s follow up as “proof” of his “shred” was: “The retractions are slimy diversions from the truth of the matter. His “retractions” are carefully parsed statements which claim, quite laughably, that he never denied anything at all” which he then follows with a total non sequitur about blacks fighting for the Confederacy in the US civil war and elected Jewish BNP councillors! On his own blog he drags up the same old links, then slyly glosses into verbose waffle about “it’s not a recant but a dodge”, etc.

Tremlett brings up a few points typical of “antis” that can be addressed.

1) The Holocaust was defined by atrocious murders, not by one single method of murder. Therefore, questioning murder methods such as a gas chamber - though very foolish and incorrect - is not Holocaust Denial by any scholarly definition.

2) Waffle and personal opinions are not “proof”. “Proof” is a logical argument or verifiable evidence that would stand up in a court of law.

3) The BNP are not racist in the correct scholarly definition of the term:

“A person with a prejudiced belief that one race is superior to others” (wordweb)

4) Someone cannot be a Holocaust Deniar if they believe (under huge provocation from thugs) that twenty million died during the Holocaust, as Griffin said at MSU. It is likely that Nick’s over estimate is a cautionary measure or a reflection of minor nerves on a stage that a blogger such as Tremlett would likely never have the courage to face.

Desire to keep one indigenous race in the majority is not “racism” or “separatism” unless Hong Kong Chinese are “Asian separatists”, Singapore likewise, Thailand’s indigenous are “Thai separatists” and other nationalistic or partisan states are all ‘racist’. The people of these places (I know from experience) would laugh at the suggestion that keeping the indigenous populace in the majority is “racist” or “sepratist”. It’s only in the western conditioned psyche that this nonsense exists.

The term “racist” as applied to the BNP can only mean that the Black Police Officers Union is racist (”Black Police officer separatists” ?) , the Asian Football League is racist and many, many others too.

That is the truth, but truth doesn’t matter to some people. Some people care more about political point scoring than they do about the deaths of innocents, usually these are people who have no other purpose to justify their existence.

It’s unlikely the left will ever put this matter to rest, but let them stew. No more talk on this topic. The GLA seat has been achieved and more will come. The beauty of truth is that it always comes through in the end. People won’t swallow lies forever.

Could our victory have been even greater?

As the BNP OS put it: was Robert Mugabe in London on Thursday night?

(This text from the OS)

A partial recount of the election – which was held on March 29 – is now taking place in 23 constituencies. A source at the recount at the Bulilima East constituency said: “There are 57 ballot boxes from 57 polling stations. We examined all the boxes from the presidential election and the seal on every one is slit. There is a foreign observer here so we hope this has been noted.”

The seals guard the keys to the padlocks on the boxes, which contain all the voting materials from a polling station, including the voters’ roll and ballot papers.”

Yet when large numbers of London Mayoral/Assembly ballot boxes were brought from supposedly secure overnight storage in the various counting centres on Friday morning, they were found to have had their seals broken! Worryingly, there was no media outcry – not even a media whimper! Despite formal complaints being made to the proper electoral authority, not a single media outlet reported on what many perceive to be massive and organised ballot box tampering – presumably because the most likely target of said suspected vote tampering or “ballot box stuffing”, would be the BNP!

Indeed, without media comment, some 400,000 ballot sips were subsequently officially declared as “spoilt”! Are we really supposed to believe that there are hundreds of thousands of Londoners unable to complete ballot forms correctly? We can only wonder what forensic examination of these “spoilt” ballot slips would reveal?

And why is it that whilst the electoral authorities in Zimbabwe managed to provide steel or moulded plastic ballot boxes, secured with padlocks, that the best the Labour regime could provide were tamper-friendly cardboard boxes and paper seals?

Quote of the week

“Like rats leaving a sinking ship”.

Richard Barnbrook, our new GLA member, as other politicians walk off stage when he enters.

“I promise every Londoner that walks, regardless of race, religion or creed, if you need someone to listen to you, I am here. All you have to do is accept the identity of this great city”.

Richard Barnbrook. A politician who tells the truth.

The BNP have arrived.

See the great speech here

Racists!

“Racist” is a term used to demonise and dehumanise BNP members as well as intimidate and bully anyone who is considering voting for the party.

I want to explain in more detail how to deal with it.

The problem is that the “BNP are racist” slur is so prejudiced and flippant in itself that it takes a little thinking and patience to show why it is nonsense. Both time and patience are qualities the far left are lacking in, so this argument might best be saved for people worth the effort. Use it with ‘would be’ BNP voters who are scared of being demonised.

Ok so the first line might go like this:

1)   “The BNP are racist”

Ask the person “What is your specific definition of racism?” and wait for a reply or simply give them your own definition, such as this one from my dictionary:

“Discriminatory or abusive behaviour towards members of another race”

and say “Yes I am a racist but so are you and so is everyone else”. When the other person gets defensive, ask then a question such as this:

“You are about to meet three people. You know one is African, one is Chinese and one is Jewish. Which one do you expect to be physically strong? Which one do you expect to talk loudly and smoke? Which one do you expect to be from a rich family?”

We all know the answers any honest person will give. If the other side gets defensive and points out that physical traits are based on scientific fact, then tell them that that is your point! Most prejudices are based on some reality - that is how they get formed in the first place - and we all have prejudices. It’s human nature to form schemas of people and groups, including racial groups. It’s how our brain makes sense of the world around us.

Now you will probably get this follow up:

2)    “But the BNP only allow white people to join. That’s racist.”

Give the person this list:
http://www.bnp.org.uk/2007/12/23/is-the-bnp-racist/

and ask them “Why don’t you blame these groups for being racist? Why do people not hate them, protest against them and try to censor them?”

You could get any range of answers, but the truth is that people get more angry about ‘white only’ groups than any other discriminatory group. That in itself is racist. Point this out to the other person. They might try and deny it but they know it’s true, and they know YOU know it’s true!

Reasonable people by now might be convinced, but a loony leftist might give a classic far left follow up:

3)       “The BNP incite racial hate, they increase racial violence, they are Holocaust                               deniers and they are [insert disgusting crime here]“

You could start by being pedantic and pointing out that this is nothing to do with the definition of “racist”.

Then calmly point out that in any civilised country, the law states that credible, verifiable evidence of such claims must be made or the charges are slander and lies.

Ask them for a single shred of statistical evidence that BNP presence increases racial assault. They will not be able to do so (because it’s a lie), and then point out that you CAN prove that racial assaults decreased in Braking and Dagenham after the BNP won a bunch of seats on the council:

http://www.angelfire.com/rock4/gregsspace/bdcrime.jpg

When Holocaust denial is mentioned, give them this URL of my blog or just get the facts and supply them yourself:

http://farleftwatch.wordpress.com/2008/03/13/holocaust-deniel/

Also mention how sad it is that people use such a terrible event and lie about it to score a few points.

If the “Supremacist” charge comes up, again ask for evidence and point out that the real “supremacists” are those who demonise anyone who talks about race or suggests that races are even remotely different. There is no racial supremacy in the BNP constitution, manifesto or membership. Period.

At this point the argument should be over. There is no logical or credible road for the opposition to go down. You have proven the fallacy and hypocrisy of calling the BNP ‘racist’ in the strict definition of the term or the flippant one.

However, hardcore reds will start to foam at the mouth at this stage. Often they will descend into drivel about how they or their friend was attacked by a BNP member (they use this guilt trip because they know it cannot be disproven) , waffle about C18 and ‘Blood and Honour’ and spout general verbosity about “You can say what you want but we know the truth”.

They also like to present the viral list of supposed BNP members who committed violent crimes and also quotes from the BBC’s “BNP: under the skin” pages.

To deal with the list of “crooks” simply point out it’s less than one percent of the party (our membership is way over two thousand people) and ask “Are you such a prejudiced bigot that you would smear an entire group of good people for the actions of less than one percent? Isn’t that very, very, fascist?”

Also use this blog:

http://liarsbuggersandthieves.blogspot.com/

or this list:

http://www.thesun.co.uk/discussions/posts/list/LABOUR~39~S_HIDDEN_SCANDAL__-70243.page

and offer to give them the name of one mainstream politician for every BNP name they give you. (If they protest that there are far more members of the mainstream parties and therefore far higher chances of a criminal in the ranks, tell them that if the ratio of BNP crime is as high as they claim, it should make no difference!)

When dealing with the Griffin quotes from the BBC website, simply state “If the BNP are as bad as you say, why is it that the best you can produce is a list of quotes over ten years old that have been frequently retracted? Where is your solid, genuine, verifiable evidence that BNP members are [insert whatever accusation was made here]?”

The nonsense about attacks on friends and B+H can again be dealt with by requests of evidence.

That should be all.

The later points we have discussed should only be required when dealing with fanatics, and remember, it’s not worth time trying to convince the unconvincibles such as the UAF. They are already too lost in hatred and hysteria to see reason so I suggest only debating with them if you really have to. (I must admit though, I am one of the worst offenders in this area though I’m trying to drop the habit!)

These points are best used when dealing with reasonable people and especially “undecided” voters. They are actually worth the time and effort and discussions with them should be done far more amicably.

It’s show time!

It’s show time.

Do you live in London? If so, get out and vote?

Do you have any friends or family in London? Even if they don’t normally vote BNP, do what you can! Every vote counts in the London Elections as the GLA seats are awarded on a proportional representation basis.

It should be clear what is wrong with the UK and time is running out to fix it.

No more ’softly softly’ for criminals!

No more oppression of free speech!

No more corporate conglomerate governors!

No more corruption!

No more appeasement of terrorists and Islamic extremists!

Vote Richard Barnbrook!

No 1 on your vote card! (literally and figuratively!)

Vote BNP!

What do the BNP and global warming have in common?

I was walking through a shopping mall yesterday to be confronted by yet another “Stop Global Warming” performance. This one happened to involve three MC’s, six massive speakers, video screens and a raffle. What it actually did to help I don’t know, but as a convenient aside it served as excellent promotion for a local radio station that had their name plastered all over the stage.

Meanwhile, local supermarkets are selling T-shirts that say “Green please” and offer bags that degrade over a year or so. Again, quite how this helps to reverse the effects of CO2 emission I have no idea, but it doesn’t harm sales for the supermarket.

Let’s face it people, we all know what this comes down to. It’s about letting ourselves off the hook. Convincing ourselves that we are good, caring, conscious people in the cheapest and easiest way possible.

Let’s look at our choices. To really do something to fight CO2 we can start by investing huge amounts in solar panels like Al Gore or - if that is too expensive - we can reduce our electricity consumption by never using a home computer to log on to Facebook, never watching TV or playing music at home again.

But of course when we say “we care” it’s important to understand that we mean: “I care, as long as it doesn’t create the slightest inconvenience for me” kind of “care”, right?

So what’s the solution? Simple, we pay lip service. We attend a rock concert filled with performers who honestly just want to stop global warming, the extra publicity and chic appeal has nothing to do with it. We shop at “green” supermarkets run by corporate conglomerates who have suddenly had a huge change of heart and put environmental concerns over and above profits, and as such they will use degradable bags to save the world. Finally, of course, we all give ourselves the cheapest possible karma hit possible: we click a button and join a facebook group called “Stop global warming! Save the polar bears!” because by clicking that button on a mouse we become honourable people!

OK, so China and India are still destroying an iceberg a day making goods that are cheap enough for us to import, but we’ve done our bit to help…….

So that’s the environmental section covered, but what about morals? What can we do to give ourselves a cheap and easy way to hold our head high, tell grandma Edna how good their grandchildren have been and make sure everyone at work knows just how moral and wholesome we are?

That’s easy, just join a group to bash the BNP! I mean, the BNP are racist aren’t they? They must be evil! I mean, didn’t you see that Griffin guy talking on Newsnight? He said Islam wasn’t a peaceful religion! What a racist bunch of pigs they are! (I know, I know, Islam isn’t a race but nobody will notice!)

So if you want a really easy, cheap, totally effortless way to make sure everyone knows you are a good person, then bash the BNP. You can do it in all the same ways you do with the ‘global warming’ thing. Go to a concert with a heroin addict and cheating boyfriend as headliner, click a button on Facebook, or join a group like the UAF. The latter is particularly fun because you get to scream hate, disrupt other people’s lives and occasionally even assault someone and it’s all OK because you are doing it with justification!

Getting the press involved is another good one. When it comes to the BNP, the tabloid press love to show that they care about people, truth and integrity by running down the BNP. If you’re lucky, you might even get a back slap from Gordon “Billions of pounds to invade Iraq over a pack of lies” Brown, who will tell you what a guardian of liberty you are.

You can call them anything you want to get your point across, you can describe them as “Scum of the Earth“, “The barrel scrapings of humanity” (copyright Jeremy Jackson, who has disappeared from our debate half way through) , “evil” etc. It really doesn’t matter as long as you make the point you are better than them. You can also bring up the “violence” thing, it actually accounts for less than one percent of the group but that’s enough to make the point isn’t it? Anyway, who cares? They’re just a bunch of prejudiced bigots!

So roll on down and get your cheap karma shot. There will still be paedophiles, muggers, rapists, murderers, terrorists and drug dealers roaming the streets (and actually the BNP really want to do something about all those people and they even have a sensible global warming policy)  but that’s not your problem. You joined a group that said “Stop the BNP” , and you even left a message saying how bad they were. You’re a truly moral person and you should feel good about yourself. And whoever thought it would be so easy?

Fitna - full, orginal and English.

It’s come to my attention that there are few, if any, full original English versions of Fitna available for download or viewing anywhere. So I made one myself. Here are a couple of links. The format is given as .wmv but if that doesn’t work, just change the extension to .mp4

Link one

Link two